home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Path: news.nask.org.pl!cyfronet!student!iskra
- From: iskra@student.uci.agh.edu.pl (Kamil Iskra)
- Subject: Re: GCC C++ questions
- Message-ID: <Dp6Fsz.MDs@cyf-kr.edu.pl>
- Sender: news@cyf-kr.edu.pl (News Administrator)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: student.uci.agh.edu.pl
- Organization: Academic Computer Centre, CYFRONET
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
- References: <4jml8e$416@lectura.CS.Arizona.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 09:31:47 GMT
-
- Dave Schaumann (dave@CS.Arizona.EDU) wrote:
- > >have you tried using the -O flag for compiling?
- > Turning on optimization isn't going to do *anything* to the size
- > of the libraries linked in.
-
- Libraries are already compiled with -O2, like all the other GNU packages
- on Amiga, BTW.
-
- > That's right, you heard it here first, folks: turning
- > on -O results in a savings of a whopping 32 bytes for this program.
- > (Which is actually fairly impressive, considering what's available
- > to be optimized).
-
- Not really. GCC produces very poor code when not optimizing.
-
- --
- / Kamil Iskra - AMIGA 1200, 68030 50MHz, HDD 850 MB, 10 MB RAM \
- | iskra@student.uci.agh.edu.pl kiskra@ernie.icslab.agh.edu.pl |
- | http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~iskra |
- \ PGP public key available via Finger or WWW /
-